I’m glad I dreamed of DELB last night. I think it was a sign that he’s my man and that I was just being prepared to not feel so bad when I found out about these tragic news today. But still. And I’m sad because in my dream, I was standing behind DELB talking to one of his friends and then he started playing hide and seek with another girl that looked like me, except taller. And I woke up feeling bad that maybe I was cheating on my beloved Tim by dreaming of DELB even though I can’t control my dreams…. and now look at this disaster.

Dear beloved Tim, I bet I loved you first. Maybe she just jumped on the bandwagon
…and don’t worry, my love, you’re the one I want to marry, not DELB but if you prefer that Maria person then… then *sobs* please be very happy. I’ll still have Adele songs on my iPod for the rest if my life.

Tim Tebow looks like a bird.

Thank You for Reporting.
Your report matters!

If one or more reliable users report this question it will be removed.
Users who have their question removed have the right to appeal.
Users who are repeatedly reported by the community will be reviewed

BlTCH, I will cut you!! Tim is my man!!

Stalker alert for Tim Tebow!

Two cannot walk together unless they are agreed.

Since Tim does not know you ….. you walk alone.

You are nuttier than a fruitcake. Tebow doesn’t know you and with your stalkerish behavior I doubt he’d want to. Get some help. Your whole attitude is unrealistic and unhealthy.

Modern Man is approximately 100,000 years old,

Hominids in general around 2 million years.

If I remember correctly the first homo sapiens were here around -100000 bc

but our ancestors were on earth millions of years before that

your question makes no sense. the evolution of ape to man took many generations. proto man walked our planet around 4 or 5 million years ago. we all evolved from them.

Well…. the Bible says humans have existed for 6000 years, so it must be true!

Depends on exactly what you mean by “human”

Modern humans are about 200,000 years old. We were almost extinct as few as 60,000 years ago. There were other hominids a half million years ago….so it is just where you draw the line.

Mostly modern humans have been around 180,000 - 200,000 years.

But evolutionary changes have happened since then — we appear to have “cross-bred” with Neanderthals around 50,000 - 75,000 years ago, for instance.
And since natural selection is always going on, humans today are different than humans a few thousand years ago…

Peace.

DOES IT MATTER?”

Homo sapiens? No. But his ancestors lived 600,000 years ago, specifically Homo heidelbergensis.

www.getyourfree100now.co.uk

• Got $5? Use adf.ly to get your friend thousands more.

  I’d rather spend $5 than eat a fly.

  Yeah.

• Also, the magical land of the walruses shall open by pressing the link, revealing a word of power that is only known by this wall, and bullshit man.
  As well, you will be bestowed the power to cast a magically line of letters in the sky, due to meeting the king of the walruses, of course when you were in their land. Don’t forget though, if you haven’t pissed in a bottle, hit yourself over the head with it, and then cut your testicles into the shape of an origami swan, you’ll end up angering the king, invoking his mighty wrath. After this, the seven medieval seal gods shall come, poking you with sticks and other mildly pointy objects, until you leave the realm and have completed the challenge of vermin supreme, and voted for him in the election. So choose wisely, either the path of the walruses, or the path that gives you the power to drink your own piss without vomiting.
  The choice is your’s.

Obama extended the Patriot Act. Unconstitutional.

Obama approved of the NDAA. Unconstitutional.

Obama’s intervention in Libya. Unconstitutional.

I can name many more Obama violations of the Constitution.

Why do you support him if he constantly violates the Law of the Land?

(Note: I bet most liberals can’t answer this question without attacking me for being conservative. For the record, I am not a Republican and I support Ron Paul, who is the modern champion of the Constitution. Now please explain why you support a Constitution-violater)
EDIT: Watch, liberals are going to start blaming Bush for the Patriot Act. Ask yourselves why Obama chose to extend the damn thing and tear the Constitution apart

Dude, George Washington made the first recess appointment.

Well it all comes down to how you interpret the constitution, this has been the debate for over 2 centuries. Good luck proving that he is interrupting the constitution wrong. Many people interpret it how it best suits them.

I guess word out is Obama could get impeached for one of those. I hope so!

I like the part where you pretend to know what the Constitution says about anything. If you like most Ron Paul supporters, you know next to nothing.

Recess appointments aren’t unconstitutional. The GOP Senators refusing to provide consent and advice on nominees is MORE constitutionally problematic.

The Patriot Act might be unconstitutional in its provisions, but the manner in which it was extended was clearly legal.

Ditto NDAA.

The War Powers Act was complied with in Libya. I guess you wanted a declaration of war? But that’s not what Libya was.

No, you can’t.

Obama isn’t the first to do these things. And he won’t be the last.

Not excusing it. But singling out Obama is just plain wrong.

Ron Paul, well, we’ll see if he REALLY does follow the Constitution. And if he’s got the backbone to stand up to Congress to have them go along with it. My guess, that last part will not happen. And, as right as he might be, he’ll be left in the dust.

Recess appointments are not a violation of the Constitution. Trying to keep Congress from recessing by gaveling in and gaveling out once every three days might be, though. Do you really want to take this to the Supreme Court to find out?

Patriot Act — passed by Congress, not overruled by Supreme Court, constitutional (for the time being, at least)

NDAA — passed by Congress, not overruled by Supreme Court, constitutional (for the time being, at least)

Intervention in Libya. Upholding UN charter treaty, which was already approved by Congress decades ago, constitutional

You will need to name many more violations to make the claim that Obama is acting unconstitutionally. So far, you’ve only proven your ignorance about the Constitution and US law.

Lmao! You Conservatives are funny people who no brains. Politicians from both sides are corrupt. Even your Reagan who sold illegal military hardware to the Iranians terrorist who never got impeach in 1986 while Bill Clinton gets impeach because he lied to the judge & relationship Monica Lewinsky? And buy other way, FDR is my boy not Obama.

Last I checked, the Supreme Court decides what is and isn’t constitutional. And since the SC is no friend of Obama I don’t think they would waste a second ruling against him.

Because he’s not doing anything presidents before him haven’t done a ton of times already:

-Recess appointments by Reagan — 240. Recess appointments by Obama — 39. Why don’t you come crying about his overreach once he has surpassed Reagan?

-John Adams instituted the Alien and Sedition Act, Bush instituted the Patriot Act — and I’ll bet you didn’t say one word against it at the time.

-The U.S. joined a U.N. coalition for dealing with Libya; it was not a unilateral action, and was well within Constitutional jurisprudence.

A better question might be “How come Obama is doing all this unconstitutional stuff and all 289 Republicans in Congress are too dumb or too lazy to do anything about it?”

Your question demonstrates that EITHER you believe Obama has “superpowers” and is able to underhandedly “neuter” the GOP, OR that in reality you understand he hasn’t actually violated the Constitution…

If recess appointments are Unconstitutional then you could blame every president since George Washington. They all have done it, some more than others. Obama has made 32 recess appointments. Reagan did 274 of them, Clinton did 140 of them, Bush Jr. did 175 of them.

I would agree the Patriot Act is unconstitutional and that point was brought up when Bush Jr. made it law. Where was your outrage then? And you should not be so naive to think that once you give power away it is a very difficult thing to take back.

NDAA at face value is unconstitutional. But Obama with his signing statement greater softened the effect.

Libya intervention was not. Congress was notified, no US ground troops ever set foot in Libya.

And Ron Paul has a couple of good ideas regarding some financial policies (the gold standard NOT being one of those) but the other 98% of his philosophy is old, utopian, fantasy land stuff more suited for the 15th century than now.

Everyone knows what prejudice is. But why do they carry it on just because there are such people who are in lower stations than them? It doesn’t seem right. Even though we are lower than third-class doesn’t mean we are not humans! Because we are. And I bet the first-class people know it too, though they pretend they don’t. Shame on them. We humans are all of a different culture, language, size, weight and all that, but in our hearts and minds we should be united together.
Nobody would think for a second that a posh, rich girl would stoop so low as to help a lowly working girl out of her troubles. But she would.
This is my story.

Awesome!!! I would love to read more of that if there was….I’m becoming your fan

I think it sounds great!!!

Please help me with my question:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120201111212AAsnF88

It’s really not very good. Your story starts out not with any part of the story or even a true statement. Your first sentence is an assumption. There is no way to prove everyone knows what prejudice is. So we’re looking at you assuming things that are not true. That is a weak start. Then you get preachy about classes and state what you think is right. So it does not read like a fiction story, but a facebook status rant.
And then “This is my story” is pretty cliche.

Don’t let anything I said stop you from telling your story. But if you have a story to tell and you want others to read it (you posted here so you must) then tell it right.

Yes, I also strongly recommend cutting “this is my story”. It’s a cliche trap many amateur writers fall into.

To be quite frank, I don’t like it. Hey, I’m not a perfect writer myself. But, I’ve studied the craft enough to know when I see bad examples. You had a few fragments in their which isn’t usually acceptable for fictional writing. Also, it doesn’t lure me in and paint a picture in my head which is the objective of stories.

Peru Uruguay Betting – Tuesday, 8:45 PM ET (Ciudad De La Plata, La Plata, Argentina)

Uruguay are favored at -130 according to soccer betting odds in this contest, while Peru is listed at +340 and a draw comes in at +235, and these two have had some wide-open matches since the last Copa America. Peru has won two and drawn one of their last four meetings with Uruguay, including a 3-0 romp in Mexico in 2007, but Uruguay responded to thump Peru 6-0 at home the following year. Peru held on in regular time, then seized control in extra time for a 2-0 win over Colombia, and captain Juan Manuel Vargas has been pulling the strings in midfield while Paolo Guerrero has two goals for Uruguay took down hosts Argentina in penalty kicks, with goalkeeper Fernando Muslera stopping Carlos Tevez during the shootout to lead the to the semifinals for the fourth straight time in the Copa America. Fullback Alvaro Pereira has a pair of goals, but the team also has Luis Suarez up front running the opposition defense ragged, while Diego Forlan has dropped a little deeper behind Suarez to fill the playmaking role.

Uruguay’s win over Argentina wasn’t that much of an upset, and they have emerged in the last year as one of the best teams in the world after last summer’s fourth-place finish in the World Cup. Peru’s goal has to be to slow down Forlan, but they also have to track Pereira, whose marauding runs can drag the defense out of position.  Peru will likely try to hit the Uruguayans on the counterattack and take advantage of the space behind their fullbacks, but will they be able to control the ball in midfield? Uruguay will have to make up for the loss of Diego Perez, who earned a red card against Argentina, but they have the quality up front to finish the chances they receive.

Betting Edge: Uruguay -130

Paraguay Venezuela Betting – Wednesday, 8:45 PM ET (Mundialista Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina)

Both of these teams were soccer betting underdogs heading into the quarterfinals, as Paraguay stunned the defending champions from Brazil, while Venezuela needed a late goal to take out Chile. Paraguay were aided by a Brazil team that couldn’t handle the pressure of a shootout as Brazil missed all four of their attempts. Brazil dominated the match, but Paraguay keeper Justo Villar was immense between the sticks, and as we all know, penalty kicks are a lottery. Venezuela took the game to Chile in an intense contest, and it was Gabriel Cichero’s 80th-minute marker that made the difference for La Vinotinto, who will get their best-ever finish in the Copa America, win or lose. They were the only side to never reach the World Cup, so Venezuela is essentially playing with house money because no one expected them to reach this point in the first place.

Paraguay is favored at -105 according to soccer odds, while Venezuela is rated at +260, and a draw comes in at +220, and these two may have had the best match of the tournament thus far in a 3-3 draw in the group stages. Paraguay now has two wins and two draws in their last five meetings with Venezuela, and all five games have had at least two goals, so these two may be a little more defensive considering what it at stake. Both teams have been getting goals from all over the place, which makes it difficult to mark them, but they can also sit back when they have to, and Venezuela’s back line has been marginally better than Paraguay, which is why they should pull off the sports betting upset.

Betting Edge: Venezuela +260

Colombia

The Colombians were the surprise of the group stages, winning Group A over the hosts from Argentina, and they didn’t allow a goal throughout the group stages. They’re a well organized group with a striker that should be getting more attention in Falcao, who scored a pair of goals against Bolivia. They have a good pedigree in this tournament, winning in 2001 and a fourth-place finish in 2004, so a trip to the semifinals isn’t out of the realm of possibility.

free sports picks: Advance

Argentina

The hosts should be able to beat Costa Rica in their finale to get to the next round, but they should have also beaten Bolivia and possibly Colombia, instead settling for a pair of draws. Lionel Messi is drawing fire for not scoring, but the team as a whole hasn’t been that good. Until an Argentinean coach finds a way to replicate Barcelona’s system, we’re afraid they won’t get the best out of Messi (although Argentina doesn’t have the quality of Barca)

free sports picks: Advance

Brazil

The defending champions have been brutal on both sides of the ball as they have to beat Ecuador to get to the next round, and Neymar has definitely faded under the spotlight as he was one of the players to watch in the Copa America. The defense has looked slow and cumbersome at time, and Robinho has struggled as well. The young midfield may be the thing that is holding this team together. It’s going to be tough for the champions get to the quarters, much less the semis.

free sports picks: Fail To Advance

Paraguay

Many soccer betting players thought of Paraguay as a darkhorse that could take down teams like Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay, but they missed a golden opportunity to hurt the Brazilians by losing a late lead in a 2-2 draw. They did well to pounce on the Brazilians’ mistakes, but shaky defending brought them down and now they have to beat Venezuela just to get to the next round. That defending will be their downfall.

free sports picks: Fail To Advance

Chile

Chile may be the most entertaining team of the tournament so far, and even though they need a draw with Peru to go through to the next round, they’re going to go for a win. Alexis Sanchez scored the equalizer for Chile in their 1-1 draw with Uruguay, and he is one to watch as he is reportedly close to sigining with Barcelona. Their go-for-broke style will be rewarded in a trip to the final four.

free sports picks: Advance

Peru

Peru should be sitting pretty, but a late draw with Uruguay in their opener has tem needing a draw with Chile in their next match. The Peruvians should go at Chile in what should be an enthralling game, but like many of the teams in the tournament, Peru has had some shocking defending late in matches. They’ve reached the quarterfinals in each of the last four editions of the Copa America, but again, their journey stops here.

free sports picks: Fail To Advance

Uruguay

Uruguay has to rely on being of the top third-place teams to get to the quarterfinals, and they’ve been just as disappointing as Brazil or Argentina. Diego Forlan looks like a shadow of the player who fired Uruguay to fourth place in the World Cup, although Luis Suarez has looked extremely good for his team. But one man can’t carry a team in a tournament as close as this and unless Forlan finds his form of last summer, Uruguay will crash out.

free sports picks: Fail To Advance

Venezuela

Venezuela is leading their group with one game to go, but a loss to Paraguay could relegate them to the final quarterfinal spot. In all honesty, just getting out of the first round for the first time since 1967 is a big enough accomplishment for the country, but the Venezuelans don’t have the quality to compete at this stage of the tournament, so stay away from their soccer betting odds.

free sports picks: Fail To Advance

That’s a tough call. He might be genuine, but you should still safeguard. but don’t rearrange your plans to go home for a little while. Don’t move in with him. And if he wants to marry you, he needs to ask you…and insist he meets your family. Then, you have to have a real wedding, the kind that you always wanted and you need to wait a year MINIMUM. You should also meet his family.

First off I would say, make sure your not in the relationship because of what he has done for you. I’m not saying you are, but that sometimes is a factor, you feel as though you owe him for what he has done for you and that is why you are with him, and if you did leave him you would hurt his feelings. I say if a person wants to help you and I mean genuinely want to help you, they won’t expect any favors in return or have any expectations

Well saying that he loves you that early in the relationship is a bit premature, he probably likes you a lot, but people often don’t understand the meaning and weight of what loving someone actually is.

I would say if he keeps pressing the topic of marriage quite often, then he probably could be using you. But don’t jump to conclusions unless you have solid evidence.

New York Rangers @ Buffalo Sabres
Wednesday February 1, 2011 – 7:30 PM ET
First Niagara Center, Buffalo, New York
NHL best sportsbook Line: New York Rangers - 110

The additions of Christian Ehrhoff, Ville Leino, and Robyn Regehr haven’t panned out the way that fans in Buffalo would have hoped, and now head coach Lindy Ruff has to figure out a way to maximize his team’s potential and turn things around. The Sabres play a crucial back-to-back against the Montreal Canadiens and Rangers coming out of the break, and anything less than four points will be a disappointment.

Rangers Sabres Betting Preview: New York Rangers

Whether it is the boost they received from constantly being under the HBO 24.7 cameras or just the perfect blend of size and speed combined with excellent goaltending, the Rangers have emerged as one of the league’s most consistent teams this season. Goaltender Henrik Lundqvist remains one of the top goalie’s in the NHL with a 1.87 goals against average, and his teammates are playing excellent hockey in front of him as New York ranks second in goals against. Offensive stars like Marian Gaborik and Richards have the Rangers on the verge of cracking the top-10 in average goals as well, and they will look to pick up from right where they left off coming out of the break.

Rangers Sabres Betting Preview: Buffalo Sabres

The Sabres can learn a lot from the Rangers, especially considering that they have a lot of the same pieces to be just as good. Ryan Miller is one year removed from the best season of his career, and while the concussion he suffered earlier in the season may be playing a part in it, he is still a top talent. Buffalo has a ton of offensive talent on its back end, particularly with Ehrhoff, and could be much better than 14th in the NHL on the powerplay. Jason Pominville leads the Sabres in scoring with 47 points, but the Sabres will need more help from their depth scorers in order to be competitive night in and night out.

Rangers Sabres Betting Preview: Outlook & Pick

While the Rangers have to travel to Buffalo, it isn’t far from New Jersey and both teams play the night before, so the schedule shouldn’t be much of a factor in this game. New York has been the more complete and more determined team all season, and that won’t change coming out of the break as New York looks to lock up the top spot in the East, beginning as best best sportsbook favorites in this matchup of in-state rivals.

Rangers Sabres Betting Pick: New York Rangers

No. They are protest groups. Learn the difference.

I’ve never seen a workable definition of “terrorist” so anything is possible.

“Summit, New Jersey invoked the USA PATRIOT Act to defend itself from a lawsuit over removing homeless people from its train station.[11]

The city said that its conduct is protected by the Patriot Act and that a homeless man’s federal lawsuit should be barred. The city cited a section of the law regarding “attacks and other violence against mass transportation systems.”

The Justice Department criticized Summit’s use of the law saying that it “[represented] a fundamental misunderstanding of what the Patriot Act is.”"

No, you are just sucking down whopping John Birch Society lies.

So in your mind Protests = Terrorists?
What happened to all that Constitution stuff you kept talking about months ago?
Suddenly you don’t like the Constitution?

No, wait. I know! You just like the word, “Constitution”, and you don’t really truly know what the Constitution actually is.

I see.

See. This is exactly why I compare Republicans to China.

Yes, and supported by Zuckermans friend in the white house.

Absolutely not. They are exercising their right to protest. Being against America in its current state is not the same as being a terrorist.

Yes, they are. Protest groups do not destroy things and harm people.

So, which is it….. there are jobs available or there’s been no job growth under this administration…..

I don’t think so, but they seem to cost everyone a lot of money, kind of like liberals. They don’t work and someone else to foot the bill.

LOL!

That is nothing!

They have jobs!

They are pissed and Jean Quan is provoking them.

Jean Quan is part of the Tea Party network to provoke and it is well known.

LOL!

If you hold a sign stating you want to save animals you are a terrorist so why does anyone care about the law?

They no longer care because everything is against the law that is their point

They no longer care because the Sheep are not being truthful and doing what is right

There is more than that layer. Those are the street OWS. There is the office OWS as well

tea Party spent 850,000 dollars saying they were going to provoke them and you complain?

They are not terrorists. They are protestors against an injustice in society. I’ve never heard that they’ve made weapons, and they’ve only caused violence in a few places.

It’s ironic that right-wingers hate these protestors and decry their anti-establishmentarianism and oppose any resulting violence, yet they often otherwise promote protests and violence against the “big” government and the “establishment.”

The GOP is a terrorist organization that should be shut down and outlawed.

eye roll
You could say the exact same thing about Tea Party people.
And I’m sure a college graduate would love to move cross country to take a non-living wage job.
You sound like that crazy man Gingrich. Time to take a dose of reality.

Bombs? Sometimes American people’s ignorance just makes me sad. That is simply not true.

It would be plastered over the news for a week if Occupy protesters tried to bomb something.

Terrorism means “The use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.” 3 Times Oakland PD has used rubber-bullets and tear-gas against peaceful protesters (it’s not a matter of opinion that they were peaceful, there is ALWAYS videos). My friend is an ex-marine and he told me that they don’t start using tear gas on crowds until they’re having pipe bombs thrown at them.

So which sound more like a terrorist organisation, the people who are treating a peaceful protest like a riot